Ryoji iwata X53e51 Wfjl E unsplash 1

The role of impact in the SFDR and ESG data overload

Faye Turner

10 min Read Time | July 1st 2022

Impaakt image

As we’re increasingly swamped with environmental, social and governance (ESG) data, how can we use it to answer meaningful questions about the impacts of our investments?

CEO and Impaakt co-founder, Bertrand Gacon, spoke to Global Banking and Finance Review to give his insight on the matter.

The data overload for asset managers and investors. ESG + SFDR

Investors and asset managers are about to get their hands on a lot more data. As EU regulations like the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), the EU Taxonomy and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) come into effect, companies will be pushed to disclose far more information about their operations and impacts. Asset managers with ESG-focused products will be filling in detailed templates to report that data back to investors. If you’re an asset manager, you are undoubtedly grappling with these templates and the sheer volume of data that’s required. Disclosures include everything from hazardous waste ratios to board diversity to the percentages of revenues, capital expenditure and operating expenses aligned with environmentally sustainable activities.

More data means more transparency

These additional disclosures are a step forward because they bring transparency. In recent decades, many investors have had to rely on ESG ratings, where providers use complex methodologies to arrive at mystical scores for each company. It can be difficult to understand why companies get certain ratings and the results can be counterintuitive. Now, with easier access to the underlying data, investors will have more control. They can select particular indicators that they care about – perhaps greenhouse gas emissions or number of patients treated – and monitor those indicators within their portfolios. However, these large sets of individual data points leave one important question unanswered: what is the overall impact of my portfolio?

impact data for investors

But what’s my impact?

As regulators ask companies and asset managers to disclose ever more information, it’s worth taking a moment to review the end goal of all these disclosures. For a growing number of investors, investing in companies with positive impact is now just as important as achieving financial goals. In particular, we want to understand the impact of our investments on the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Are we investing in companies that make positive or negative contributions, both overall and to individual SDGs? As more data becomes available, how do we use that data to come to a general conclusion about a company or a portfolio’s impact?

Why ESG scores aren’t enough

Taking large sets of ESG data and coming to an overall conclusion about a company is exactly what ESG providers do when they calculate scores and ratings. However, in general, ESG scores and ratings are not good measures of impact. There are two reasons for this.

Firstly, most ESG scores are trying to answer a different question. They are less concerned with the impact of a company on people and planet and more concerned with the impact of people and planet on a company. They focus on working out which ESG factors are “material” for a company’s financial performance, and then assess how it is managing the risks and opportunities that those factors represent. There are good historical reasons for this. A decade ago, the way to convince investors to consider ESG was to show that it mattered to financial performance. However, the world has moved on. Most investors not only accept the importance of ESG to financial returns but are equally concerned with the environmental and social impacts of the companies they invest in (“double materiality”).

The second challenge for ESG ratings providers is that impact isn’t easily measured by finite data sets and rigid methodologies. You never know where or how impacts will arise, or what the knock-on effects could be. The actions of one company could cause a ripple of impacts on other companies or communities – positive or negative – that no pre-defined set of metrics could capture. However, any formal methodology for calculating an overall impact score or rating will need to make some decisions in advance: firstly, which data points it will use to measure impacts, and secondly how it will weight those different data points. For example, is water pollution relevant to an e-commerce company? Is job creation more or less important than greenhouse gas emissions or child labour? The need to make this kind of decision would limit the scope of impact ratings and prevent them from capturing the full breadth and depth of impacts – particularly anything unusual or unpredicted. This approach is also unavoidably subjective. Although ratings providers follow a rules-based methodology, there were many subjective decisions involved in developing that methodology. This helps to explain why ESG ratings for a single company can vary so much across the different ratings providers.

Ryoji iwata X53e51 Wfjl E unsplash 1

Harnessing the wisdom of crowds

In finance, we usually try to eliminate subjectivity. However, the solution to the challenge of impact assessment is to embrace it. Impacts are impacts on people and the environment that people live in, so what people think and feel about impact is impact. Regulations like SFDR and CSRD will put a lot more ESG data at our disposal. What if a broad community of experts – tens of thousands of people rather than a single ESG rating provider – could review that data and decide which data points are relevant to which companies and what they tell us about a company’s impact? What if they could also supplement that data with local or industry-specific data that the regulatory data sets don’t capture? If this community is sufficiently large and diverse, their collective view on the impacts of a company is surely valid. It is more neutral and objective than the views of individual ratings providers, and closer to a market valuation of impact. This is the future of impact assessment and – thanks to global connectivity and the power of the internet – it’s already a reality.

Learn more about the impact data Impaakt provides below.

Article originally provided for Global Banking and Finance Magazine

Impact Data Services


Based on the article you've just read, here are some more we think you'd be interested in.

Screenshot 2022 12 15 at 13 55 01

7 Min read

Forbes feature Impaakt "Rating Corporations’ Impact On Society And The Earth"

Read what Forbes have to say about our Global Impact Ranking Report

Web page 01

11 Min read

Global Impact Rankings Report 2022

Our annual Global Impact Rankings Report is out, discover which companies are leading the way on environmental & social impact issues and which need to step up their efforts.

Vadim bogulov Mf Bnq U Oz q Y unsplash

11 Min read

Double-materiality is only useful when it is not associated with revenues

Impaakt co-founder Bertrand Gacon gives his insight on materiality to Global Banking & Finance Magazine.

Diane picchiottino Hk Rl0t6 QUEA unsplash

9 Min read

How to avoid greenwashing - with the Fintech Times

Impaakt CEO Bertrand Gacon talks to The Fintech Times about how investors can avoid greenwashing.

Best ESG Fintech Company Europe 2022 Blue

8 Min read

Impaakt named 'Best ESG Fintech Company Europe 2022'

Global Banking and Finance Magazine award Impaakt with the title of 'Best ESG Fintech Company 2022'

Client Website Page Impaakt 500 500 px

8 Min read

Client Case Study - Reyl Intesa Sanpaolo

Learn how the data and analytics that Impaakt provides, enable global financial institutes to progress their commitment to sustainable finance beyond ESG.

SDG wheel icon

8 Min read

Corporate Impact Series 2022

Which corporate earned an Impact Leader Badge this year? Find out.

Grey Impaakt Icon

10 Min read

ESG is out – Impact is in. Innovative start-up ‘Impaakt’ turns heads with award wins and new clients.

Awards wins & what our clients have to say about us. Read our latest press release.

Impaakt Wealth and Finance Award Winners

9 Min read

Impaakt wins Ethical Finance Innovator Award

Industry recognised "Wealth & Finance Magazine" awards Impaakt with 'Innovator of the Year' in their annual Ethical Finance Awards.

Fiancial times impaakt

8 Min read

Impaakt referenced in the Financial Times

Moral Money article references Impaakt and it's unique approach to impact measurement.

World Green Background Sustainability small

Let’s take action together

With the right investment companies having a positive impact on the planet are able to flourish. Our community forms part of that mission by measuring their impact.

Join Us